1. New Product Development In Marketing
2. New Product Development Process Template
3. New Product Development Meaning

New Product Development: Chapter 13 SUMMARY: Firms develop new products to increase the width and depth of their product mix and compete in the market place. New products can be categorized as (1) new to the world, (2) new product lines, (3) additions to the existing product lines, (4) improvements in the existing products, (5) repositioning the existing product, and (6) reducing the cost of products. The stages of new product development are (a) idea generation, (b) screening, (c) concept testing and business analysis, (d) product development, (e) test marketing and (f) commercialization. A company seeks new ideas to enhance the performance of its existing products or for developing new products. New ideas can be generated with the help of customers, dealers, employees, market research consultants, and advertising agencies etc.

As if a business can’t be developed in a day or so, same goes with the new product development. What are the major stages in new product development? New Product Development Process - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Process of new product development New product are develop through a systematic process,in which first the product are find out and then it grows.

As all ideas may not be commercially viable, they need to be screened and few ideas are selected to consider them for the next stage. After screening the ideas, the company tests the concept or ideas through concept testing. During concept testing, the ideas are submitted for external evaluation, to obtain the feedback from the potential market. After concept testing, the firm makes a plan for developing, producing and marketing the new product. It does a business analysis to test the technical feasibility. It then develops a product prototype, which reveals all the function and aesthetics of the product.

Prototypes are developed in limited numbers in the company’ lab and are used for the testing purposes. This prototype is put through product use testing to test its functionality. Marketers then test the product in select cities and gradually commercialize it in other parts of the country depending on the response from the market.

In and, new product development ( NPD) covers the complete process of bringing a new to market. A central aspect of NPD is, along with various business considerations. New product development is described broadly as the transformation of a into a product available for sale.

The product can be tangible (something physical which one can touch) or intangible (like a, or ), though sometimes services and other processes are distinguished from 'products.' NPD requires an understanding of customer needs and wants, the competitive environment, and the nature of the market.

Cost, time and quality are the main variables that drive customer needs. Aiming at these three variables, develop continuous practices and strategies to better satisfy and to increase their own by a regular development of new products. There are many uncertainties and challenges which companies must face throughout the process.

The use of and the elimination of barriers to communication are the main concerns for the of the NPD. Contents. Process structure The product development process typically consists of several activities that firms employ in the complex process of delivering new products to the market. A approach is used to provide a structure. Product development often overlaps much with the process, particularly if the new product being developed involves application of math and/or science.

Every new product will pass through a series of stages/phases, including among other aspects of, as well as and market introduction. In highly complex engineered products (e.g.

Aircraft, automotive, machinery), the NPD process can be likewise complex regarding management of personnel, milestones and deliverables. Such projects typically use an approach. The process for managing large-scale complex engineering products is much slower (often 10-plus years) than that deployed for many types of consumer goods. The product development process is articulated and broken down in many different ways, many of which often include the following phases/stages:. Fuzzy front-end (FFE) is the set of activities employed before the more formal and well defined is completed. Speak to what the product should do or have, at varying degrees of specificity, in order to meet the perceived market or business need. Product design is the development of both the and design of the product: which turns the what of the requirements into a specific how this particular product will meet those requirements.

This typically has the most overlap with the process, but can also include and even purely aesthetic aspects of design. On the marketing and planning side, this phase ends at pre-commercialization analysis stage. Product implementation often refers to later stages of detailed engineering design (e.g. Refining mechanical or electrical hardware, or software, or or other product forms), as well as that may be used to validate that the prototype actually meets all design specifications that were established.

Fuzzy back-end or commercialization phase represent the action steps where the and market launch occur. The front-end marketing phases have been very well researched, with valuable models proposed.

Peter Koen et al. Provides a five-step front-end activity called front-end innovation: opportunity identification, opportunity analysis, idea genesis, idea selection, and idea and technology development. He also includes an engine in the middle of the five front-end stages and the possible outside barriers that can influence the process outcome. The engine represents the management driving the activities described.

The front end of the innovation is the greatest area of weakness in the NPD process. This is mainly because the FFE is often chaotic, unpredictable and unstructured. Engineering design is the process whereby a technical solution is developed iteratively to solve a given problem The design stage is very important because at this stage most of the product life cycle costs are engaged.

Previous research shows that 70–80% of the final product quality and 70% of the product entire life-cycle cost are determined in the product design phase, therefore the design-manufacturing interface represent the greatest opportunity for cost reduction. Design projects last from a few weeks to three years with an average of one year. Design and Commercialization phases usually start a very early collaboration. When the concept design is finished it will be sent to manufacturing plant for prototyping, developing a Concurrent Engineering approach by implementing practices such as, / and more. The output of the design (engineering) is a set of product and process specifications – mostly in the form of drawings, and the output of manufacturing is the product ready for sale. Basically, the design team will develop drawings with technical specifications representing the future product, and will send it to the manufacturing plant to be executed.

Solving product/process fit problems is of high priority in information communication design because 90% of the development effort must be scrapped if any changes are made after the release to manufacturing. Models Conceptual models have been designed in order to facilitate a smooth process.

The concept adopted by IDEO, a successful design and consulting firm, is one of the most researched processes in regard to new product development and is a five-step procedure. These steps are listed in chronological order:. Understand and observe the market, the client, the technology, and the limitations of the problem;. Synthesize the information collected at the first step;. Visualise new customers using the product;. Prototype, evaluate and improve the concept;.

Implementation of design changes which are associated with more technologically advanced procedures and therefore this step will require more time. One of the first developed models that today companies still use in the NPD process is the Booz, Allen and Hamilton (BAH) Model, published in 1982. This is the best known model because it underlies the NPD systems that have been put forward later. This model represents the foundation of all the other models that have been developed afterwards. Significant work has been conducted in order to propose better models, but in fact these models can be easily linked to BAH model. The seven steps of BAH model are: new, idea generation, screening and evaluation, business analysis, development, testing, and commercialization. A pioneer of NPD research in the consumers goods sector is Robert G. Card reader.

Over the last two decades he conducted significant work in the area of NPD. The Stage-Gate model developed in the 1980s was proposed as a new tool for managing new products development processes. This was mainly applied to the consumers goods industry. The 2010 APQC benchmarking study reveals that 88% of U.S. Businesses employ a stage-gate system to manage new products, from idea to launch. In return, the companies that adopt this system are reported to receive benefits such as improved teamwork, shorter cycle time, improved success rates, earlier detection of failure, a better launch, and even shorter cycle times – reduced by about 30%. These findings highlight the importance of the stage-gate model in the area of new product development.

Over the last few years, the movement has grown in popularity, challenging many of the assumptions inherent in the stage-gate model. Marketing considerations There have been a number of approaches proposed for analyzing and responding to the marketing challenges of new product development. Two of these are the eight stages process of Peter Koen of the, and a process known as the fuzzy front end.

Fuzzy Front End The Fuzzy Front End (FFE) is the messy 'getting started' period of new product engineering development processes. It is in the front end where the organization formulates a concept of the product to be developed and decides whether or not to invest resources in the further development of an idea. It is the phase between first consideration of an opportunity and when it is judged ready to enter the structured development process (Kim and Wilemon, 2007; Koen et al., 2001).

It includes all activities from the search for new opportunities through the formation of a germ of an idea to the development of a precise concept. The Fuzzy Front End phase ends when an organization approves and begins formal development of the concept.

Although the Fuzzy Front End may not be an expensive part of product development, it can consume 50% of development time (see Chapter 3 of the Smith and Reinertsen reference below), and it is where major commitments are typically made involving time, money, and the product's nature, thus setting the course for the entire project and final end product. Consequently, this phase should be considered as an essential part of development rather than something that happens 'before development,' and its cycle time should be included in the total development cycle time.

Distinguish five different front-end elements (not necessarily in a particular order):. Opportunity Identification. Opportunity Analysis. Idea Genesis. Idea Selection. Idea and Technology Development. The first element is the opportunity identification.

In this element, large or incremental business and technological chances are identified in a more or less structured way. Using the guidelines established here, resources will eventually be allocated to new projects. Which then lead to a structured NPPD (New Product & Process Development) strategy. The second element is the opportunity analysis. It is done to translate the identified opportunities into implications for the business and technology specific context of the company. Here extensive efforts may be made to align ideas to target customer groups and do market studies and/or technical trials and research.

The third element is the idea genesis, which is described as evolutionary and iterative process progressing from birth to maturation of the opportunity into a tangible idea. The process of the idea genesis can be made internally or come from outside inputs, e.g. A supplier offering a new material/technology or from a customer with an unusual request. The fourth element is the idea selection.

Its purpose is to choose whether to pursue an idea by analyzing its potential business value. The fifth element is the idea and technology development. During this part of the front-end, the business case is developed based on estimates of the total available market, customer needs, investment requirements, competition analysis and project uncertainty. Some organizations consider this to be the first stage of the NPPD process (i.e., Stage 0). The Fuzzy Front End is also described in literature as 'Front End of Innovation', 'Phase 0', 'Stage 0' or 'Pre-Project-Activities'. A universally acceptable definition for Fuzzy Front End or a dominant framework has not been developed so far.

In a glossary of PDMA, it is mentioned that the Fuzzy Front End generally consists of three tasks: strategic planning, idea generation, and, especially, pre-technical evaluation. These activities are often chaotic, unpredictable, and unstructured.

In comparison, the subsequent new product development process is typically structured, predictable, and formal. The term Fuzzy Front End was first popularized by Smith and Reinertsen (1991). Cooper (1988) describes the early stages of NPPD as a four-step process in which ideas are generated (I), subjected to a preliminary technical and market assessment (II) and merged to coherent product concepts (III) which are finally judged for their fit with existing product strategies and portfolios (IV). Other approaches Other authors have divided predevelopment product development activities differently:. Preliminary. Technical assessment.

assessment: suppliers and partners or alliances.: market size and segmentation analysis, VoC research. Product idea testing. assessment. Product definition.

Business and financial analysis These activities yield essential information to make a Go/No-Go to Development decision. One of the earliest studies using the case study method defined the front-end to include the interrelated activities of:.

product strategy formulation and communication. opportunity identification and assessment.

idea generation. product definition. project planning. executive reviews Economical analysis, benchmarking of competitive products and modeling and prototyping are also important activities during the front-end activities. The outcomes of FFE are the:. mission statement. customer needs.

details of the selected idea. product definition and specifications. economic analysis of the product.

the development schedule. project staffing and the budget. a business plan aligned with corporate strategy A conceptual model of Front-End Process was proposed which includes early phases of the innovation process.

This model is structured in three phases and three gates:. Phase 1: Environmental screening or opportunity identification stage in which external changes will be analysed and translated into potential business opportunities. Phase 2: Preliminary definition of an idea or concept. Phase 3: Detailed product, project or service definition, and Business planning.

The gates are:. Opportunity screening. Idea evaluation. Go/No-Go for development The final gate leads to a dedicated new product development project. Many professionals and academics consider that the general features of Fuzzy Front End (fuzziness, ambiguity, and uncertainty) make it difficult to see the FFE as a structured process, but rather as a set of interdependent activities ( e.g. Kim and Wilemon, 2002).

However, Husig et al., 2005 10 argue that front-end not need to be fuzzy, but can be handled in a structured manner. In fact Carbone showed that when using the front end success factors in an integrated process, product success is increased. Peter Koen argues that in the FFE for incremental, platform and radical projects, three separate strategies and processes are typically involved. The traditional Stage Gate (TM) process was designed for incremental product development, namely for a single product.

The FFE for developing a new platform must start out with a strategic vision of where the company wants to develop products and this will lead to a family of products. Projects for breakthrough products start out with a similar strategic vision, but are associated with technologies which require new discoveries. Incremental, platform and breakthrough products include:. Incremental products are considered to be cost reductions, improvements to existing product lines, additions to existing platforms and repositioning of existing products introduced in markets.

Breakthrough products are new to the company or new to the world and offer a 5-10 times or greater improvement in performance combined with a 30-50% or greater reduction in costs. Platform products establish a basic architecture for a next generation product or process and are substantially larger in scope and resources than incremental projects.

Organizations. (PDMA).

New Product Development In Marketing

(The International Society for Professional Innovation Management). Strategies. Management.

This section may need to be rewritten entirely to comply with Wikipedia's, as it consists of lists, where coherent text should be. Phrasing is sometimes confused / confusing at best. The may contain suggestions. (September 2014) Companies must take a holistic approach to managing this process and must continue to innovate and develop new products if they want to grow and prosper. CUSTOMER CENTERED New Product Development.

Focuses on:. Finding new ways to solve customer problems. Create more customer-satisfying experience Companies often rely on technology, but the real success comes from understanding customer needs and values. Oxford England: Oxford University Press.

Kahn, Kenneth B. The PDMA handbook of new product development (3 ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc. A thorough understanding of customers' needs and wants, the competitive situation, and the nature of the market is an essential component of new product success. Koen, Peter A. Consortium for corporate entrepreneurship.

New Product Development Process Template

Retrieved February 5, 2017. Smith, P. Robert; Eppinger, P. Steven (1997). 'Identifying controlling features of engineering design iteration'. Management Science. 43 (3): 276–293.

Yassine, Ali; Braha, Dan (2003), Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 11 (3):165-177. Yassine, Ali; Joglekar, Nitin; Braha, Dan; Eppinger, Steven; Whitney, Daniel (2003),'Information hiding in product development: the design churn effect.' Research in Engineering Design, 14 (3): 131-144. Yan-mei, Zhou (2009). 'Cost-benefit of interface management improvement in design-manufacturing chain'. Chinese academy of science and technology management.

14 (3): 380–384. access-date= requires url=. Hargadon, Andrew (1997).

'Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm'. Administrative Science Quarterly. 42 (4): 716–749.

^ Adler, S. 'Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: the case of the design/manufacturing interface'. Organisation Science. 6 (2): 147–167.

'A review of the IDEO process'. External link in website= ; Missing or empty url= ; access-date= requires url=. Allen & Hamilton, Booz. 'New products management for the 1980s'. Booz, Allen & Hamilton - original from Indiana University. access-date= requires url=.

Bruiyan, Nadia (2011). 'A framework for successful new product development'. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 4 (4): 746–770. access-date= requires url=.

Cooper, Robert (1990). 'Stage-gare systems: A new tool for managing new products'. Business Horizons. 33 (3): 44–55. Kenneth, Kahn (2013). The PDMA handbook of new product development (Third ed.).

Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Kim, J.; Wilemon, D. 'Sources and assessment of complexity in NPD projects'. R&D Management. 33 (1): 16–30. ^ Koen; et al. 'Providing clarity and a common language to the 'fuzzy front end '.

Research Technology Management. 44 (2): 46–55. Smith, Preston G. And Reinertsen, Donald G. (1998) Developing Products in Half the Time, 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1998. Husig and Kohn (2003), Factors influencing the Front End of the Innovation Process: A comprehensive Review of Selected empirical NPD and explorative FFE Studies, Brusell, Juni 2003, p.14.

Product Development & Management Association. Archived from on 2009-03-21. Smith, Preston G., Reinertsen Donald G. (1991) Developing products in half the time, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. Cooper, R.G.

Predevelopment activities determine new product success, in: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.17 (1988), No 2, pp. 237-248. Cooper R.G., Edgett, S.J. (2008), Maximizing productivity in product innovation, in: Research Technology Management, March 1, 2008. Khurana, A; Rosenthal, S.R.

'Towards Holistic 'Front Ends' in New Product Development'. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 15 (1): 57–75.

Husig, S; Kohn, S; Poskela, J (2005). The Role of Process Formalisation in the early Phases of the Innovation Process. Development Conf. Kim, J., Wilemon, D. (2002): Accelerating the Front End Phase in New Product Development. Thomas A.

Carbone, Critical Success Factors in the Front-End of High Technology Industry New Product Development, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Alabama in Huntsville, November, 2011. Al., Front-end success factors and the impact on high technology industry new product development. 2012 IEEE International Technology Management Conference, Dallas, Tx, USA. ^ Koen, Peter A. (2004), 'The Fuzzy Front End for Incremental, Platform, and Breakthrough Products', PDMA Handbook of New Product Development, 2nd Ed.: 81–91. Gary Armstrong, P.

New Product Development Meaning

Marketing an introduction (11th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson.